The Sainte-Laguë formula is used to allocate seats to parties contesting the party vote that cross the threshold for allocation of winning at least one electorate seat or 5% of all party votes cast nationally.
The following describes the steps and then uses the 2002 general election result to illustrate the process. If you want to see what would happen with different levels of party vote you can use the MMP seat allocation calculator [1].
The chief electoral officer takes the following steps:
The process is prescribed by the Electoral Act 1993 s.191-s.193A [2].
The Chief Electoral Officer drew up a table with the name of each party shown on the party vote, the number of party votes it won, the percentage of all party votes it won and the number of electorate seats won by it and its component parties. (Some minor parties not crossing the threshold are combined under the heading 'Other parties' for this demonstration.)
The Chief Electoral Officer then excluded parties that were not eligible for a proportional share of seats by deleting any party that had not crossed the threshold by winning at least 5% of the total number of party votes and had not won at least one electorate seat under its own name or that of a component party. The Christian Heritage Party gained 1.35% of all the party votes and did not win any electorate seats, so all the party votes for the Christian Heritage Party and other parties in the same situation were excluded. Although Jim Anderton's Progressive Coalition won less than 5% of all the party votes, it won an electorate seat and so qualified for a proportional share of all 120 seats based on its party votes.
The Chief Electoral Officer then took the total party votes for each qualifying party and divided the figures by a sequence of odd numbers starting with 1 (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 and so on shown in the far left column of the table). The resulting numbers are called quotients. The division continues until enough quotients had been found to allocate all 120 seats. The numbers to the right of the highest 120 quotients indicate their order from highest to lowest. The 121st quotient is shown in brackets.
View Table [3]
Labour | National | NZ First | ACT New Zealand | Green Party | United Future NZ | Jim Anderton's Progressive Coalition | |
No. of quotients in highest 120 | 52 | 27 | 13 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 2 |
Labour | National | NZ First | ACT New Zealand | Green Party | United Future NZ | Jim Anderton's Progressive Coalition | |
No. of electorate seats won | 45 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
No. of list seats allocated(bolded in table under Step 3) | 7 | 6 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 1 |
Registered Parties that gained at least 5% of all Party Votes or won at least one electorate seat
| Party Votes | % of all Party Votes cast for parties eligible for a proportional share of seats | Number of electorate seats won |
Labour Party | 838,219 | 43.38 | 45 |
National Party | 425,310 | 22.01 | 21 |
NZ First | 210,912 | 10.92 | 1 |
ACT New Zealand | 145,078 | 7.51 | 0 |
Green Party | 142,250 | 7.36 | 0 |
United Future NZ | 135,918 | 7.03 | 1 |
Jim Anderton's Progressive Coalition | 34,542 | 1.79 | 1 |
Total | 1,932,229 | 100.00 | 69 |
Registered Parties | Party Votes | % of all Party Votes | No. of electorate seats won
|
|---|---|---|---|
Labour Party | 838,219 | 41.26 | 45 |
National Party | 425,310 | 20.93 | 21 |
NZ First | 210,912 | 10.38 | 1 |
ACT New Zealand | 145,078 | 7.14 | 0 |
Green Party | 142,250 | 7.00 | 0 |
United Future NZ | 135,918 | 6.69 | 1 |
Jim Anderton's Progressive Coalition | 34,542 | 1.70 | 1 |
Christian Heritage Party | 27,492 | 1.35 | 0 |
Outdoor Recreation NZ | 25,985 | 1.28 | 0 |
Alliance | 25,888 | 1.27 | 0 |
Other parties | 20,023 | 0.99 | 0 |
Total | 2,031,617 | 100.00 | 69 |
Links:
[1] http://www.elections.org.nz/calculator/
[2] http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2007/0111/latest/contents.html
[3] http://www.elections.org.nz/voting/mmp/st-lague-step-3-2002.html